Validation report

This page is for

(error)  Organizational subscribers | (error) Individual subscribers | (tick) Cochrane users


Validation errors and warnings are only relevant to Cochrane authors submitting reviews to Cochrane. RevMan subscribers can disregard validation errors and warnings. 

Validation report

The validation report shows you discrepancies between your review and Cochrane standards for a review.

These can be defined as Errors or Warnings. Errors MUST be addressed before submission, as you will not be able to submit your Cochrane Review to Editorial Manager with errors present. All warnings should also be checked, with reference to editorial policy as required.

You can see validation errors and warnings relevant to your review on the Dashboard. Expand or collapse the Validation menu to view further details.

In Intervention and flexible reviews, validation errors and warnings are also visible in the right-hand Context pane. Use the links to navigate to the next issue you need to address. 




Validation rules


Validation errors and warnings are generated dynamically depending on the specific content of the review, and so the below list is not exhaustive - rules not in this list may still apply


 

Type

Section

Validation rule

Review stage

Description

1

Error

Abstract

Abstract cannot exceed 1000 words.

R

The abstract cannot be longer than 1000 words (word count: [count])

2

Error

Figures

Figure should be linked from text.

P + R

Figure is not linked from the text.

3

Error

Additional table

Table should be linked from the text.

P + R

Table is not linked from the text.

4

Error

Analysis

An active choice of labels for graph axes is required. 

R

The default graph label 'Favours [experimental]' must be changed.

5

Error

Dates

Date of Search cannot be empty.

R

Date of search is empty.

6

Error

Plain language summary

Summary cannot exceed 850 words.

R

The plain language summary cannot be longer than 850 words (word count: [count])

7

Error

Published notes

Cannot be empty for withdrawn reviews.

P+R

Published notes do not contain the reason for withdrawal. Provide a brief explanation of why the review was retracted. See Withdrawing articles published in the CDSR.

8

Error

Summary title

Default text '[Summary title]' should be modified.

R

The plain language summary title is empty.

9

Error

Analysis

Synthesis PICO not completed.

P+R

Synthesis PICO is not completed. The review cannot be checked in until outcome and interventions have been specified.

10

Error

What's new

Section cannot be empty unless protocol or review is new. See also What’s new events.

P+R

What's new is empty.

12

Error

Differences between the protocol and review

Field cannot be empty.

R

Differences between protocol and review is empty.

13

Error

Main text sections

Mandatory text sections (depending on stage) cannot be empty. See full list of validation of text sections below. 

P+R

[Section] is empty.

14

Error

Event

Only events relevant to the current stage are allowed.

P+R

Event is not allowed at [Protocol/Full review] stage.

15

Error

Event

Description cannot be empty.

P + R

Description is empty.

16

Error

Dates

Date of Search cannot be in the future.

R

Date of Search is in the future.

17

Error

Dichotomous study data

Events <= Total

R

The number of events cannot be larger than the number of totals.

18

Error

What's new

Section cannot include more than one New citation event. See also What’s new events.

P + R

More than one declaration event ('New citation' or 'No longer being updated').

19

Error

Event

Withdrawn reviews only support Amended events. 

R

Withdrawn reviews only support Amended events.

20ErrorWhat's newIf an Updated event is present, there must be a New citation event. See also What’s new events.RAn updated event is present without declaring a new citation.
21ErrorDatesAssessed as Up-to-date cannot be empty.RAssessed as Up-to-date is empty.
22Error

Included study, Excluded study

Study should have at least one reference.

R

If a Study ID is inserted in the References to studies section, a reference must be added

23Error

Included study

All included studies must be cited in the main article.

R

Included study not cited in the main article, including additional tables. 

24ErrorDatesAssessed as Up-to-date cannot be in the future.RAssessed as Up-to-date is in the future.

34

Error

Reference

All fields should not be empty at the same time.

P+R

Reference is empty.

35

Error

Reference

Required fields should not be empty.

P+R

[Field name] is empty.

36

Error

What's new

If a New citation event is present, there should usually also be an Updated event. See also What’s new events.

R

A new citation is declared without the review being updated

25

Warning

Studies

All fields in study characteristics should not be empty at the same time.

R

Study characteristics are missing.

26

Warning

Additional reference

Reference should be linked from the text.

P+R

Reference is not linked from the text.

27

Warning

Figures

The recommended Number of figures has been exceeded.

 P+R

The recommended maximum number of figures (6) has been exceeded - please remove [n].

28WarningFiguresOther figures must contain an image file.  P+RNo file uploaded for figure [n]
29WarningFiguresOther figures should be more than 500 pixels wideP+ROther figures should be more than 500 pixels wide

37

Warning

Cochrane review reference, Cochrane protocol reference

The DOI identifier should be specified correct.

P + R

DOI should be corrected according to these examples: 10.1002/14651858.CD123456 or 10.1002/14651858.CD123456.pub2

38

Warning

Cochrane review reference, Cochrane protocol reference

SO field should be 'Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews'.

P + R

Journal/Book/Source should be Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

39

Warning

Cochrane review reference, Cochrane protocol reference

Should have DOI identifier.

P + R

DOI is missing.

40

Warning

Comparison

Should not have empty analyses.

R

One or more analyses have no associated study data.

41

Warning

Inverse variance analyses or subgroup

Option to enter number of participants has been selected, but no data have been entered for any studies.

R

The option to enter number of participants has been selected, but no data have been entered.

42

Warning

Other data type analyses

No column heading should be empty.

R

One of the column headings is empty.

43

Warning

Date of search

The latest search should have been conducted fewer than 12 months

R

The latest search should have been conducted fewer than 12 months before submission. See Cochrane Handbook.

44

Warning

Sources of support

Section could not be empty.

P+R

No sources of support listed.

 R= Full Review stage
 P= Protocol stage


Validation of empty text sections 

The intervention review template aids authors in what to report where to ensure compliance with PRISMA and will improve consistency across Cochrane reviews for reader. The following table shows validation of empty text sections in both the focused and the long review formats. It also shows how review headings have changed, indicating where text has moved to if a section has been removed in switching to the focused review format.

High level headings that do not have a corresponding text field and therefore do not need to be validated are highlighted in light blue.

Flexible reviews

In the 'Text' section of flexible reviews only the Heading 1 (H1) level is displayed. Sub-headings can be created by authors from the formatting toolbar. See Add or adjust subheadings.

Level 1 headingH1
Level 2 headingH2
Level 3 heading

H3

Level 4 headingH4

Focused review format

Focused format validation 

Error = section cannot be empty

Warning or No validation = optional but check template for reporting guidance


Long review format

Long format validation 

Error = section cannot be empty

Warning or No validation = optional but check template for reporting guidance

(H1) Title  

(H1) Title 

(H1) Abstract  

(H1) Abstract  

(H2) Rationale  

Error

(H2) Background 

Error

(H2) Objectives 

Error

(H2) Objectives 

Error

(H2) Search methods 

Error

(H2) Search methods 

Error

(H2) Eligibility criteria 

Error

(H2) Selection criteria 

Error

(H2) Outcomes 

Error



(H2) Risk of bias 

Error



(H2) Synthesis methods 

Error

(H2) Data collection and analysis 

Error

(H2) Included studies 

Error



(H2) Synthesis of results 

Error

(H2) Main results 

Error

(H2) Authors' conclusions 

Error

(H2) Authors' conclusions 

Error

(H2) Funding

(all review types)

Error



(H2) Registration

(all review types)

Error



(H1) Plain language summary  

Error

(H1) Plain language summary  

Error

(H1) Plain language summary title  

Error 

(H1) Plain language summary title  

No validation

Key messages 

No validation

Key messages 

No validation

Tailored heading: e.g. What is epilepsy? 

No validation

Tailored heading: e.g. What is epilepsy? 

No validation

Optional tailored heading: e.g. How is epilepsy treated? 

No validation

Optional tailored heading: e.g. How is epilepsy treated? 

No validation

What did we want to find out? 

No validation

What did we want to find out? 

No validation

What did we do? 

No validation

What did we do? 

No validation

What did we find? 

No validation

What did we find? 

No validation

Main results 

No validation

Optional heading: Main results 

No validation

What are the limitations of the evidence? 

No validation

What are the limitations of the evidence? 

No validation

How up to date is this evidence? 

No validation

How up to date is this evidence? 

No validation

(H1) Summary of findings 

No validation

(H1) Summary of findings 

No validation

Summary of findings tables 


Summary of findings tables 

No validation

(H1) Background  

No validation

(H1) Background  

No validation

(H2) Description of the condition 

Warning

(H2) Description of the condition 

Warning

(H2) Description of the intervention and how it might work 

Warning

(H2) Description of the intervention 

Warning



(H2) How the intervention might work

(text moved to ‘Description of the intervention and how it might work’ section in focused format)

Warning

(H2) Why it is important to do this review 

Error

(H2) Why it is important to do this review 

Warning

(H1) Objectives  

No validation

(H1) Objectives  

Error

(H1) Methods

No validation

(H1) Methods  

(H2) Criteria for considering studies for this review 

Error

(H2) Criteria for considering studies for this review 

No validation

(H3) Types of studies  

Error

(H3) Types of studies  

Error

(H3) Types of participants  

Error

(H3) Types of participants  

Error

(H3) Types of interventions  

Error

(H3) Types of interventions  

Error

(H2) Outcome measures  

Error

(H3) Types of outcome measures  

Warning

(H3) Critical outcomes  

Error

(H4) Primary outcomes  

Warning

(H3) Important outcomes  

Error

(H4) Secondary outcomes  

Warning

(H2) Search methods for identification of studies 

Error

(H2) Search methods for identification of studies 

No validation

(H3) Electronic searches 

Error

(H3) Electronic searches 

Error

(H3) Searching other resources 

Error

(H3) Searching other resources 

Error

(H2) Data collection and analysis 

No validation

(H2) Data collection and analysis 


(H3) Selection of studies  

Error

(H3) Selection of studies  

Error

(H3) Data extraction and management  

Error

(H3) Data extraction and management  

Error

(H3) Risk of bias assessment in included studies  

Error

(H3) Assessment of risk of bias in included studies  

Error

(H3) Measures of treatment effect  

Error

(H3) Measures of treatment effect  

Error

(H3) Unit of analysis issues  

Error

(H3) Unit of analysis issues  

Error

(H3) Dealing with missing data  

Error

(H3) Dealing with missing data  

Error



(H3) Assessment of heterogeneity 

(text moved to ‘Synthesis methods’ section in focused format)

Error

(H3) Reporting bias assessment  

Error

(H3) Assessment of reporting biases  

Error

(H3) Synthesis methods  

Error

(H3) Data synthesis  

Error

(H3) Investigation of heterogeneity and subgroup analysis  

Error

(H3) Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity 

Error

(H4) Equity-related assessment  

Error



(H3) Sensitivity analysis  

Error

(H3) Sensitivity analysis  

Error

(H3) Certainty of the evidence assessment (L3)  

Error

(H3) Summary of findings and assessment of the certainty of the evidence  

Error

(H2) Consumer involvement 

Error



(H1) Results 

No validation

(H1) Results 

(H2) Description of studies 

No validation

(H2) Description of studies 

Warning

(H3) Results of the search  

Error

(H3) Results of the search  

Error

(H3) Included studies  

Error

(H3) Included studies  

Error

(H3) Excluded studies  

Error

(H3) Excluded studies  

Error

(H2) Risk of bias in included studies 

No validation

(H2) Risk of bias in included studies 

Error



(H3) Allocation (selection bias)

Error if 'Risk of bias in included studies' section is empty 



(H3) Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)

Error if 'Risk of bias in included studies' section is empty 



(H3) Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Error if 'Risk of bias in included studies' section is empty 



(H3) Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Error if 'Risk of bias in included studies' section is empty 



(H3) Other potential sources of bias

Error if 'Risk of bias in included studies' section is empty 

(H2) Synthesis of results 

Error

(H2) Effects of interventions 

Error

(H3) Equity assessment 

No validation



(H3) Reporting biases  

No validation



(H1) Discussion 

No validation

(H1) Discussion 


(H2) Summary of main results 

Error

(H2) Summary of main results 

Error

(H2) Limitations of the evidence included in the review 

Error

(H2) Overall completeness and applicability of evidence 

Error



(H2) Quality of the evidence 

(text moved to ‘Limitations of the evidence included in the review’ section in focused format)
Warning

(H2) Limitations of the review processes 

Error

(H2) Potential biases in the review process 

Error

(H2) Agreements and disagreements with other studies or reviews 

Error

(H2) Agreements and disagreements with other studies or reviews 

Error

(H1) Authors' conclusions 

No validation

(H1) Authors' conclusions 

(H2) Implications for practice 

Error

(H2) Implications for practice 

Error

(H3) Equity-related implications for practice 

No validation



(H2) Implications for research 

Error

(H2) Implications for research 

Error

(H3) Equity-related implications for research 

No validation



(H1) Supplementary materials

(all review types)
No validation

(H1) Appendices 

No validation

All supplementary materials listed 




(H1) Additional information 

No validation

(H1) Additional information 

No validation

(H2) Acknowledgements 

Error

(H2) Acknowledgements 

Error

(H2) Contributions of authors 

Error

(H2) Contributions of authors 

Error

(H2) Declarations of interest 

Error

(H2) Declarations of interest 

No validation

(H2) Sources of support 

Error

(H2) Sources of support 

No validation



(H2) Differences between protocol and review

(text moved to ‘Methods’ section in focused format)
Error

(H2) Registration and protocol

(all review types)
Error



(H2) Data, code and other materials

(all review types) 
Error



(H2) Published notes 

No validation

(H2) Published notes 

No validation

(H2) What's new 

Error

(H2) What's new 

No validation

(H2) History 

No validation

(H2) History 

No validation

(H1) References  

(H1) References 

 


(H2) References to studies included in this review

No validation

 


(H2) References to studies excluded from this review

No validation

 


(H2) References to studies awaiting assessment

No validation

 


(H2) References to ongoing studies

No validation

 


(H2) Additional references

No validation

 


(H2) References to other published versions of this review

No validation

(H1) Figures  

No validation

(H1) Figures 

No validation

(H1) Tables 

(all review types)
No validation

(H1) Additional tables 

No validation