Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • If an update of an affected review is already planned, or is planned as a result of the Funding Arbiter decision, the Funding Arbiters will ask the CRG editorial team to make a statement within the review to identify it as noncompliant and set out a plan to become compliant.
  • For a protocol, the Funding Arbiters will ask the CRG editorial team to make a statement within the protocol to identify it as noncompliant and set out a plan for it to be compliant when it is published as a review.
  • If the Funding Arbiters ask for the protocol or review to be withdrawn because no update will be made, see the separate guidance.

Table 1 outlines what the statement must include, where it should be located, and which What's New/publishing event to use. Table 2 and Table 3 provide template text that CRGs can use in the affected review(s) or protocol(s) in their immediate response (stating noncompliance) and in their longer-term response (addressing compliance after a full update or amendment).

...