Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Cochrane Review Group Specialized Register: request for exemptions

Date

Section

What's new

  

GeneralNew.

Cochrane Review proposals

...

Date

Section

What's new

 

Cochrane Review versions and citationsNew page

 

Policy for assigning ‘What’s New’ events
  • Page title changed from “What's New events (publishing events) in Cochrane Reviews: new publication, new citation, or change in publication status” to “Policy for assigning ‘What’s New’ events”
  • Text changed to clarify policy requirements
  • Text about citations moved to new section ‘About citation versions’.

 

Policy for assigning ‘What’s New’ events

Added an example of when a new citation is not required: addition of a comment and/or a reply to the feedback section but with no other changes to the (apart from minor typographical errors).

 

Digital object identifier (DOI) and website address (URL) of a Cochrane Review

Updated with new Cochrane Library URL and Crossref DOI display guidelines.

 

Policy for assigning ‘What’s New’ events

Scenarios updated; the previous iteration of the policy is available as a PDF file.

Comments

Date

Section

What's new

 

General

Added report of Comments received during 2018. Updated information on how to cite comments.

Complimentary Cochrane Library access for Cochrane authors and Groups

...

Reporting search dates in Cochrane Reviews

Date

Section

What's new

 

General

Clarified definition of "Full search – results fully incorporated" in Table and provided references.

January 2015

General informationAt the joint meetings of the Co-ordinating Editors, Managing Editors, and Trials Search Co-ordinators held during the Cochrane Colloquia in Auckland (2012) and Quebec (2013) it was agreed that ‘Date of search’ should be used instead of ‘Assessed as up-to-date’ to reflect the search and full incorporation of all search results into a Cochrane Review. The technical issues associated with retiring the ‘Assessed as up-to-date’ field are currently being addressed by Cochrane and Wiley; however this will not prevent editorial teams from adhering to this new policy on how to report search dates.

...