ME Support stock of FAQ responses (1)
Platform |
Category |
Question |
Answer |
Example cases |
||
RevMan |
Incorrect What's new events when re-publishing a review |
The review was published as an Update with the correct two What's new events: Updated + New citation conclusions changed. The following month, the byline was changed & the review was republished with an addition (3rd) What's new event: Amended |
When the review was re-published as an Amendment, the two What's new events: Updated + New citation conclusions changed should have been moved to the History. The re-publication should have had two What's new events: Amended + New citation conclusions not changed, as the review does need a new citation due to change in the byline order. |
143768 |
||
RevMan |
Changing RevMan Unique ID |
How to change the Unique ID in a RevMan file |
Place mouse over Unique ID number |
|
||
Archie |
Split and merge wizard |
We've got 2 generic protocols that will form the basis for 20+ reviews. |
Publish the generic protocol |
136398 |
||
RevMan |
Handing over a review update to a new author team |
I have a published review that is quite old now. I have a new review team that is willing to take on the review but the methods need to be updated and we are including new comparisons. I'm pretty sure I can't register the same title again whilst the old review is alive and kicking. |
I treat it as an update |
|
||
Archie |
Protocol amendment vrs new protocol? |
Our review is due for an update but the authors want to change the scope and methods substantially (broader intervention, broader inclusion criteria for participants, additional outcomes, updated methods). In this case, do we: |
If such substantive changes are planned to be made for this review, you might want to consider: |
148662 |
||
|
Permissions and reprints to re-use material from the CDSR |
How to quote preliminary results from a soon to be published Cochrane review. |
The EPPR has a section dealing with unpublished versions: |
http://www.cochranelibrary.com/])." |
145108 |
]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> |
|
Timeline from publication on CDSR to review citation appearing on MEDLINE |
How long it takes from the publication of a review until they will see the citation appear in Medline. Do you know the answer to this? |
PubMed submissions will take 12 months from the date of publication, of a green OA review. The citation will be registered in NLM on the day of publication, once NLM accept the NLM auto-deposition process. This will backdate to September, so all content published since then will be supplied to PubMed. |
144791 |
||
Archie |
Steps to republish to capture NIH grant for a review |
A review has been published without acknowledging grant funding. The NIH requires all peer-reviewed publications that receive grant support to be included in PubMed Central. |
(1) Add the correct info to sources of support/acknowledgements and republish as an Amendment (no new citation). |
150337 |
||
LfP forms |
Open access form |
Our ME is on leave and has asked me to publish the update above with open access. Can you advise which option I should chose: CC-BY-NC-ND (Attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives) CC-BY-NC (Attribution, non-commercial) CC-BY (Attribution) *** Must be mandated by funder |
The choice of licence should be referred to the author team. Recommend the author team is directed to this page to review the licence options: http://community.cochrane.org/editorial-and-publishing-policy-resource/publishing-model/open-access |
|||
Archie |
Gold open access |
This review has already been published but the authors would like to pay for Gold Open access. How do we do this post-publication? |
Move any What's new events to History. |
152418 |