Materials or Procedures (interventions)

All drugs

In many reviews authors include any drug within a specific drug category or categories.

• use the drug classification

example: DrugCategory - Immunoglobulins

Any intervention

Sometimes the intervention will be stated as any intervention.

• omit the controlled vocab term
• annotate the intervention modifiers (if there are any)
• leave the classification heading blank/unselected if not specified

Combination drug terms  

• Annotate with the two or more separate drugs or drug categories using AND

example: Favipiravir Combined With Tocilizumab - Favipiravir AND Tocilizumab

• Exception: combination drugs where the combination is widely known as as single medication

example: Lopinavir And Ritonavir which is known as Kaletra

Dose, schedule and duration

If this information is not available or not required the fields remain empty.

Some review questions will focus on

• dose comparisons between different interventions and comparisons
• comparison of specific doses of the same drug 

Injections

• choose injection as a delivery method modifier for the intervention
• use more specific injection terms in the delivery method modifier section if indicated in the review text

Back to top

Classification categories

For both the Intervention and Comparison components there is a 15 item classification of interventions from Davey et al.

This classification is built upon the Health Research Classification System developed by the UK Clinical Research Collaboration.

New group/arm - how and when to use

Some studies are designed to compare several interventions with one another so that there is no single Comparison. These studies are referred to as multi-arm studies and each “arm” of the study receives one of the interventions.  

Multi-arm study 

If authors of a review state no clear Comparison each of the arms should be annotated as a New Arm in the Intervention

• use the ‘add new arm’ function to indicate different interventions that are to be compared with one another
• Comparison should be left blank
• if a Comparison is clearly identified it should be annotated in the Comparison

Two-arm study

• There may not be a clearly identified Comparison but review authors may want to look at studies comparing two different interventions with one another
• Annotation is the same as for multi-arm studies

Studies split by review authors

• Typically there should be one study annotation for each included study in a given review
• Each row in the a review's PICO Characteristics of Included Studies table represents one study, however, some review authors have split up their description of a multi-arm trial into two or more rows

Where authors have split a multi-arm study into different rows

• only one of the rows needs to be annotated 
• the data from the other arm(s) should be added to the one you are annotating

<script type="text/javascript">
AJS.toInit(function(){
AJS.$('#comments-section').hide();
});
 for (var i=0; i<nr_li; i++) {
    // if the element has the class fom 'clasa' parameter
    if(tags_li[i].getAttribute('class') == 'innerCell'){
         tags_li[i].style.overflow = 'visible';
            //tags_li[i].style.overflow-y= 'visible';
    }   
  }
</script>

Back to top