Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1478831991.1224.1711712424844@localhost> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_1223_371008198.1711712424844" ------=_Part_1223_371008198.1711712424844 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
Cochrane= =E2=80=99s editorial and publishing policies can now be found on the Cochra= ne Library Editorial pol= icies page. Cochr= ane authors and editorial teams should refer to the Cochrane Library as the= primary source of information on this policy. For editorial guidance on po= licies the EPPR remains the primary location. |
---|
Cochrane Reviews should only be withdrawn under exceptional circumstance= s, for example, if there is a concern about the conduct or reporting of the= Cochrane Review. Reasons that do not fall under exceptional circumstances = include questions related to the usage and currency of the review in questi= on, the availability of new studies or information, how this information co= uld impact the review and whether there are new methods that could make imp= ortant changes to the review.
|
Withdrawing a Cochrane Review generates a new citation version. For Cochrane= Reviews, this includes a new entry in PubMed.
Withdrawal policy: change in policy for protocols =As of March 2022, protocols must not be withdrawn for any= reason other than serious error. The current withdrawals policy can now be= found on the Cochrane Library= Editorial policies page. |
Prior to March 2022, protocols were also withdrawn for one of the follow= ing reasons:
With the introduction of the new policy in March 2022, the decisio= ns or events described above are covered by Editorial Notes. See also Editorial note: editorial guidance.=
Withdrawing a protocol for a Cochrane Review generated a new citation version<= /a>.
Up to 16 December 2014, withdrawn protocols were removed from the CD= SR after one issue of publication. From this date onwards, withdrawn p= rotocols remain published to maintain the public record of publication and = to complement the inclusion in PROS= PERO.
The Editors may accept for publication a revised version of a Cochrane R= eview that addresses the issues raised in the withdrawn notice. Any such ve= rsion will be re-evaluated using standard Cochrane editorial process, and m= ay then be approved for publication (as a separate, subsequent version) in = consultation with the Editor in Chief= .