Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <157198063.834.1711667485819@localhost>
Subject: Exported From Confluence
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_Part_833_1459947054.1711667485819"
------=_Part_833_1459947054.1711667485819
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
CRG and DTA editorial team peer review policies and procedures=
title>
CRG and DTA editorial team peer review policies and procedures
All Cochrane Review Groups and the DTA Editorial Team state their specific peer review process cl=
early on their website, including:
- A link to the Cochrane peer review policy.
- Any additional information on the peer review process specific to the C=
RG.
- Estimated timelines for peer reviewing a Cochrane Review or a DTA Revie=
w, as appropriate. (e.g. you will usually be asked to return the peer revie=
w checklist/provide a peer review report within three weeks)
- The specific role of the Information Specialist(s), Managing Editor(s) =
(including Assistant/Deputy Managing Editors), Editor(s) and Co-ordinating =
Editor(s) in the peer review process, specific to the CRG.
- The aimed for number/mix of peer reviewers per Cochrane Review (either =
a link to this document, or CRG-specific aims) - must not be fewer rev=
iewers than the minimum number stated in the policy.
- A clear statement on the CRG=E2=80=99s approach to consumer peer review=
and the support available for consumer peer reviewers
- Guidance for peer reviewers specific to the CRG or DTA editorial team, =
including what to do/who to contact if misconduct is suspected.
- From December 2019, a list of peer reviewers who submitted reports in t=
he current calendar year, and, in subsequent years, an archive of previous =
years=E2=80=99 peer reviewers.
------=_Part_833_1459947054.1711667485819--